$0 is better than ‘free’
Using “$0” or “at no cost” reminds people they are not losing money, rather than gaining something “free”. That increases conversions.
This Korean research from last year is beautifully simple and easy to apply. The fact that not everybody is using it yet just goes to show how slow academic research trickles down to marketers.
New around here? Subscribe for $0 below. (see what I did there?)
Use “$0” rather than “free” to increase conversion rates
Impacted Metrics: Conversion rate
Channels: Pricing | Promotions
When you are giving something away, as part of a promotion or for lead generation, say that it’s for “$0” or “at no cost” rather than “free” to increase conversions.
The “$0” vs “free” effect was tested in 10 experiments. Online, in a lab, and in a retail environment for various types of free promotions, such as free gift certificates, “buy one get one free” promotions, and free offerings. It worked better in all cases.
The effect is weaker when consumers are less price conscious or when the purchase is for someone else (i.e. a gift).
It’s stronger for products that consumers are price sensitive about (i.e. grocery products), as opposed to luxury products.
It’s also more effective for situations in which consumers expect good deals (e.g. discount stores) than for those in which consumers seek quality (e.g. department stores).
(Ad mockup used in the research - Click on the image to zoom)
Why it works
Our preference for promotions is affected by the way they are presented. For example, we prefer “get 50% more free” (buy 2, get 1 free) than “get 33% off” (get 3, pay for 2) although they are the same thing.
People are value-conscious. We want to know how much we are spending or saving. Reminding us of the monetary value and cost shifts our mindset. This makes us value something ‘at no cost’ more.
Loss aversion theory tells us that people would rather not lose something than gain something. When we talk about “Free” we are thinking of a gain, while if we use “$0” we are reminded we are not losing money.
The effect works less for gift givers because they are thinking about pleasing the receiver, so are less concerned about cost.
It’s possible that people are more suspicious of $0 offers (e.g. a phone plan) as they are predominantly used in telecom, insurance, leasing, and lending plans and often hide a lot of ‘fine print’. This could have implications for your brand. However, this study didn’t measure people’s perceptions and long-term behavior, only their immediate actions.
Companies using this
Some companies and advertising agencies occasionally use “$0” instead of “free”, (e.g. IKEA) but the use appears to be spotty and inconsistent.
Steps to implement
Update your copy and promotions to use “$0” or “at no cost” instead of “free”.
Field, lab, and online experiments, US, UK, Canada, and South Korea
Koo, J., & Suk, K. (December 2019). Is $0 Better than Free? Consumer Response to “$0” versus “Free” Framing of a Free Promotion. Journal of Retailing.
Korea University and Pukyong National University
Remember: Because of the groundbreaking nature of this paper, it could be disproven in the future (although this is rare). It also may not be generalizable to your situation. If it’s a risky change, always test it on a small scale before rolling it out widely.
Want to share feedback or ask a question? -> Write me at firstname.lastname@example.org
Did you enjoy it? -> Please share this or share it on Slack, it really does make a difference. Thank you!
New around here? -> Subscribe below or read previous articles here